Heat sealable coating with filler

ABSTRACT

A coating for paperboard includes polyethylene outer layers and a polyethylene inner layer with calcium carbonate filler. In addition to the lower cost, benefits include a surprising better heat sealing behavior compared with a coating of polyethylene alone.

This application is a 371 of PCT/US2016/062134 filed on 16 Nov. 2016.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/258,568 filed on Nov. 23,2015 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a plastic coating structure, and morespecifically to a plastic coating structure including an interior layerwith an inorganic filler.

BACKGROUND

In the field of packaging it is often required to provide consumers withstructure that may be securely closed by heat sealing.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure is a paperboard coated on at least one surfacewith a heat sealable polymer containing an inorganic filler. In oneembodiment, the heat sealable polymer is a three-layer structure with aninterior layer container an inorganic filler, and exterior layerscontainer little or no filler.

The heat sealable polymer may be applied as an extrusion coating. Thepolymer may be a thermoplastic material from petroleum-based orbio-based sources and may be selected from at least one of the followingpolymeric resins or their blends in one or multiple extrusion coatinglayers: low density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low density polyethylene(LLDPE), medium density polyethylene (MDPE), high density polyethylene(HDPE), metallocene-catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE),single site-catalysed linear low density polyethylene (sLLDPE), andhomogenous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer.

The inorganic filler reduces coating cost, improves certain processingconditions, and provides better heat sealing properties in a finishedpaperboard product. The extrusion coating layer may contain at least oneof the following inorganic mineral fillers: calcium carbonate, talc,mica, diatomaceous earth, silica, clay, kaolin, wollastonite, pumice,zeolite, ceramic spheres, and the like.

Within the scope of this application it is envisaged and intended thatthe various aspects, embodiments, examples, features and alternativesset out in the preceding paragraphs, in the claims and/or in thefollowing description and drawings may be taken independently or in anycombination thereof. For example, features described in connection withone embodiment are applicable to all embodiments unless there isincompatibility of features.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1A is a simplified, cross section view of a paperboard structurewith a plastic coating;

FIG. 1B is a simplified, cross section view of a paperboard structurewith a monolayer filled plastic coating;

FIG. 1C is a simplified, cross section view of a paperboard structurewith a multilayer filled plastic coating;

FIG. 2 is a graph showing polymer-to-polymer heat seal rating versussealing temperature for several monolayer, filled plastic coatings;

FIG. 3 is a graph showing polymer-to-polymer heat seal rating versussealing temperature for several multilayer, filled plastic coatings;

FIG. 4 is a graph showing polymer-to-paperboard heat seal rating versussealing temperature for several monolayer, filled plastic coatings;

FIG. 5 is a graph showing polymer-to-paperboard heat seal rating versussealing temperature for several multilayer, filled plastic coatings; and

FIG. 6 is a graph of repulpability for various extrusion layerstructures.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Detailed descriptions of specific embodiments of the packaging materialare disclosed herein. It will be understood that the disclosedembodiments are merely examples of the way in which certain aspects ofthe invention can be implemented and do not represent an exhaustive listof all of the ways the invention may be embodied. As used herein, theword “exemplary” is used expansively to refer to embodiments that serveas illustrations, specimens, models, or patterns. Indeed, it will beunderstood that the packaging materials described herein may be embodiedin various and alternative forms. Any specific structural and functionaldetails disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, butmerely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis forteaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the invention.

FIG. 1A shows a simplified cross section diagram of a packaging material100 including a paperboard 110 with a plastic coating, here being a lowdensity polyethylene (LDPE) coating 120. The thicknesses shown in FIG.1A and the other figures herein are not to scale. For example, thepaperboard 110 may range in thickness from 0.012 inches to 0.018 inches(12 points to 18 points). As denoted in FIG. 1A, the entire thickness(100%) of the coating 120 may be LDPE. The coating 120 may be applied,for example by extrusion coating onto paperboard 110.

As shown in FIG. 1B, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) may be used as a mineralfiller to partially replace low density polyethylene (LDPE) resin in anextrusion coating. Packaging material 102, accordingly, may be made frompaperboard 110 coated with a monolayer 122 of LDPE mixed with CaCO3. Asdenoted in FIG. 1B, the entire thickness (100%) of the monolayer coating122 may be LDPE with CaCO3 filler.

As shown in FIG. 1C, a packaging structure 104 may be made by coatingpaperboard 110 with a multilayer plastic coating 123 including calciumcarbonate (CaCO3)-filled LDPE as an interior layer 125 between LDPElayers 124, 126. The CaCO3 filled LDPE interior layer 125 may make upfrom 10% to 90% of the total thickness of the multilayer coating, whileeach of the LDPE layers 124, 126 may make up from 5-45% of the totalthickness of the multilayer coating.

The use of the CaCO3 filler reduces cost of the coating. Surprisinglywhen compared to paperboard extrusion coated with LDPE coating 120alone, the paperboard coated with monolayer coating 122 of filled LDPEprovides improved heat sealing. Furthermore, the paperboard coating withmultilayer coating 123 while also having improved heat sealingproperties has certain improved properties compared with the monolayercoating 122.

In one example of a method for applying the CaCO3 filled LDPE, a calciumcarbonate-LDPE ‘concentrate’ was blended in various ratios with a base(100%) LDPE. The calcium carbonate concentrate contained about 76.5%CaCO3 in LDPE. Various blends of the concentrate were made with the LDPEbase resin as an extrusion coated monolayer 122 on an 18-point solidbleached sulphate (SBS) paperboard for cup stock.

FIG. 2 shows the results of polymer-to-polymer (self-seal) heat sealtests for various monolayer plastic coatings, with the heat seal ratingranging from 0 (poor) to 5 (very good). The heat seal rating is plottedagainst sealing bar temperature. As sealing bar temperature increases,the heat seal rating improves. A control sample using pure LDPE gave thelowest heat seal ratings, while the test samples filled with CaCO3ranging from 15-52% by weight had heat seal ratings always at leastequal to the control sample, and usually better than the control sample.At sealing bar temperatures from 210-220 F, the CaCO3-filled testsamples had heat seal ratings 1-2 values higher than for the pure LDPEcontrol. Put another way, a given polymer-to-polymer heat seal ratingbetween 2 and 4 was generally achieved for the CaCO3 filled test samplesat sealing bar temperatures 5-10 F lower than for the control samples.These results are included in the Table 1 summary at the end of thedescription.

As further testing, the same CaCO3/LDPE concentrate was blended with aLDPE base resin at various amounts and used in the center core layer ofa 3-layer co-extruded coating 123 where the two outer layers were onlyLDPE base resin. The two outer LDPE layers were approximately 15% of thetotal co-extrusion structure whereas the center core layer of CaCO3/LDPEblend was approximately 70% of the total co-extrusion structure.

FIG. 3 shows the results of polymer-to-polymer (self-seal) heat sealtests for various multilayer plastic coatings. The heat seal rating isplotted against sealing bar temperature. As temperature increases, theheat seal rating improves. A control sample using pure LDPE gave thelowest heat seal ratings, while the test samples filled with CaCO3ranging from 15-51% by weight nearly always had heat seal ratings betterthan the control sample. At temperatures from 210-220 F, theCaCO3-filled test samples had heat seal ratings about 2-3 values higherthan for the pure LDPE control. Put another way, a givenpolymer-to-polymer heat seal rating between 1 and 4 was generallyachieved for the CaCO3 filled test samples at sealing bar temperaturesat least 10 F lower than for the control samples. These results includedin the Table 1 summary. At a given sealing bar temperature, themultilayer coating with a given CaCO3 fill percentage in its inner layergenerally gave polymer-to-polymer heat seal ratings one half unit to oneunit better than the corresponding monolayer coating using the sameCaCO3 fill percentage.

Besides the polymer-to-polymer (self-sealing) behavior of the coatingsas shown in FIGS. 2-3, the polymer-to-paperboard sealing behavior wastested. Good polymer-to-paperboard heat sealing is important, forexample, in forming paper cups. FIGS. 4-5 show results ofpolymer-to-paperboard (“cup forming”) heat seal tests.

FIG. 4 shows results for monolayer plastic coatings. The heat sealrating is plotted against side-wall temperature. As side-walltemperature increases, the heat seal rating improves. Monolayer testsamples filled with 15-30% by weight CaCO3 had heat seal ratings usuallybetter than the control sample. At side-wall temperatures from 600-700F, the CaCO3-filled monolayer test samples had heat seal ratings 1-2values higher than for the pure LDPE control. This means that a givenpolymer-to-polymer heat seal rating between 2 and 3 was generallyachieved for the 15-30% CaCO3 filled test samples at side-walltemperatures 50 F lower than for the control samples. These results areincluded in the Table 1 summary.

Heat seal ratings for monolayer test samples filled with 41-52% CaCO3were usually worse than the control sample at a given side-walltemperature, or in other words, to achieve a given heat seal rating,required side wall temperature was at least 50 F higher compared withthe monolayer LDPE coating.

FIG. 5 shows the results of polymer-to-paper heat seal tests for variousmultilayer plastic coatings. The heat seal rating is plotted againstsidewall temperature in a cup-forming process. As temperature increases,the heat seal rating improves. A control sample using pure LDPE gave thelowest heat seal ratings. With the multilayer coating, test samplesfilled with CaCO3 ranging from 15-51% by weight nearly always had heatseal ratings better than the control sample. At temperatures from550-700 F, the CaCO3-filled multilayer test samples had heat sealratings about 2-3 values higher than for the pure LDPE control. A givenpolymer-to-paperboard heat seal rating between 2 and 4 was generallyachieved for the CaCO3 filled test samples at side wall temperatures atleast 100 F lower than for the control samples. The results are includedin the Table 1 summary.

As seen by comparing FIGS. 2 and 3 for self-sealing (polymer-to-polymersealing), and FIGS. 4 and 5 for cup forming (polymer-to-paperboardsealing), the multilayer polymer coating with a given percentage CaCO3in its internal layer gave better heat sealing than a monolayer polymercoating with the same CaCO3 percentage throughout. Furthermore, it wasfound that the multilayer coating had fewer processing problemsincluding die-lip buildup, streaking, and chill roll plate-out. Thus toachieve a given heat seal rating at a given sealing temperature, it ispossible to use a higher loading of CaCO3 with the three-layercoextrusion coating as compared with the monolayer extrusion coating.

Although the outer layers of the multilayer coating in these exampleswere the same thickness (15% of the coating thickness) and the innerfilled layer 70% of the total thickness, it is envisioned that the outerlayers of different thicknesses might be used. Instead of each outerlayer being 15%, with the inner filled layer being 70% of the totalthickness, it is envisioned that each outer layer might be from 5-45% ofthe total thickness, and the inner filled layer from 10 to 90% of thetotal thickness.

FIG. 6 is a bar graph showing repulpability of various extrusion layerstructures, given as a percent accepts through a 0.006 inch slot screenafter repulping for 15 minutes. All of the structures with CaCO3 fillranging from 15% to 52% had better repulpability than the controlLDPE-coated structure without CaCO3 filler.

Although the polymer used in the above examples was LDPE, other polymersmay be used, or blends or polymers may be used. For example, bio-basedlow density polyethylene may be used.

TABLE 1 Heat Seal Performance Summary Poly-to-Poly Seal Poly-to-PaperSeal Structure (Bar Sealer) (Cup Former) PE Good Good Paperboard PE +CaCO3 Better (5-10° F. lower) Better (50° F. lower, <30% Paperboard15-52% CaCO3 CaCO3), Worse (>42% CaCO3) PE Best (10-20° F. lower) Best(150° F. lower) PE + CaCO3 15-52% CaCO3 15-52% CaCO3 PE Paperboard

The invention claimed is:
 1. A paperboard structure comprising: apaperboard substrate having a first surface and an opposed secondsurface; and a polymer coating on the first surface, comprising: a firstplastic layer attached to the first surface; the first plastic layerhaving a first thickness and consisting of LDPE; a second plastic layerattached to the first plastic layer, the second plastic layer having asecond thickness, the second plastic layer containing at least 1% byweight of an inorganic filler; and a third plastic layer attached to thesecond plastic layer, the third plastic layer having a third thickness.2. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein the third plastic layerconsists of LDPE base resin.
 3. The paperboard structure of claim 1,wherein the first thickness is between 5-45% of the total thickness ofthe polymer coating.
 4. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein thefirst thickness is between 10-40% of the total thickness of the polymercoating.
 5. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein the firstthickness is between 20-30% of the total thickness of the polymercoating.
 6. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein the secondplastic layer comprises LDPE base resin.
 7. The paperboard structure ofclaim 1, wherein the second thickness is between 10-90% of the totalthickness of the polymer coating.
 8. The paperboard structure of claim1, wherein the second thickness is between 20-80% of the total thicknessof the polymer coating.
 9. The paperboard structure of claim 1, whereinthe second thickness is between 40-60% of the total thickness of thepolymer coating.
 10. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein thesecond plastic layer contains from 1% to 75% by weight of an inorganicfiller.
 11. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein the secondplastic layer contains from 10% to 60% by weight of an inorganic filler.12. The paperboard structure of claim 1, wherein the second plasticlayer contains from 15% to 52% by weight of an inorganic filler.
 13. Thepaperboard structure of claim 1, wherein the inorganic filler is atleast one of calcium carbonate, talc, mica, diatomaceous earth, silica,clay, kaolin, wollastonite, pumice, zeolite, and ceramic spheres. 14.The paperboard structure of claim 1, having a polymer to polymer heatseal rating of at least 2 when sealed under conditions of 80 psipressure with a 3 second dwell time using a sealing bar temperature of210-215° F.